Website Design & Development
We create stunning, user-friendly websites that drive growth.
Every open access journal faces the same fundamental question: if readers don't pay for access, who covers the costs of publishing? Two dominant models have emerged—Article Processing Charges (APCs) paid by authors, and Diamond open access funded through institutional or other support. Each approach has implications for sustainability, author accessibility, and journal positioning.
The Economics of Journal Publishing #
Publishing scholarly journals involves real costs regardless of business model: platform hosting and maintenance, editorial management (even if editors volunteer), copyediting and production, metadata registration and DOI fees, long-term archiving, and technical support. Someone pays for these services—the question is who.
Traditional subscription journals passed costs to readers (or their institutions' libraries). Open access eliminates reader payment, requiring alternative funding sources. The two main approaches represent fundamentally different answers to this funding question.
Understanding APCs #
Article Processing Charges shift publishing costs to the supply side: authors (or their funders/institutions) pay upon acceptance. The model works like paying for service—journals provide editorial evaluation, production, and dissemination; successful authors pay for that service.
How APCs Work #
Authors submit manuscripts normally. If accepted after peer review, the journal requests payment before publication. Charges vary enormously—from a few hundred dollars at smaller journals to thousands at prestigious venues. Payment typically comes from research grants, institutional funds, or authors' personal resources.
APC Advantages #
Direct Revenue Link: Each published article generates income. This creates sustainable funding tied to output volume—more publications mean more revenue to support operations.
Author Investment: Authors paying fees may be more invested in successful publication, potentially improving submission quality as authors submit only their strongest work.
Scalability: The model scales naturally with journal growth. Larger journals publishing more articles generate proportionally more revenue.
Independence: APC-funded journals don't depend on institutional subsidies, grants, or volunteer labour that might fluctuate or disappear.
APC Concerns #
Access Barriers: Authors without funding—independent researchers, scholars in underfunded institutions, researchers in lower-income countries—may be unable to pay. This creates "pay to publish" barriers that exclude legitimate research.
Quality Perception: The APC model creates financial incentives to accept submissions. While reputable journals maintain standards regardless of funding model, the structure invites criticism about whether fees influence decisions.
Predatory Exploitation: The APC model has enabled predatory publishers—operations collecting fees without providing genuine peer review or editorial services. This abuse tarnishes legitimate APC journals by association.
Equity Issues: Global research funding disparities mean APC burdens fall unevenly. Well-funded researchers at wealthy institutions pay easily; others struggle or cannot participate.
Planning Your Journal's Funding Model?
Whatever model you choose, professional infrastructure reduces costs and improves sustainability. We help journals operate efficiently regardless of funding approach.
Understanding Diamond Open Access #
Diamond (or platinum) open access eliminates charges on both sides: readers don't pay subscription fees, and authors don't pay publication charges. Funding comes from institutions, societies, grants, or volunteer labour rather than from users of the publication service.
How Diamond Works #
Funding sources vary widely. Universities may support journals as part of their scholarly communication mission. Learned societies publish journals using membership dues or institutional support. Government or foundation grants underwrite operations. Often, academic editors donate time their institutions effectively subsidise.
Diamond Advantages #
No Author Barriers: Without fees, all researchers can submit regardless of funding status. This eliminates APC-related equity concerns and opens journals to voices that fees might exclude.
Aligned Incentives: With no per-article revenue, journals have no financial incentive to accept marginal submissions. Quality decisions remain purely editorial.
Community Service: Diamond journals often serve specific communities—scholarly societies, disciplines, regions—as a service rather than a business. This aligns with academic values of knowledge as public good.
No Predatory Confusion: Without author fees, diamond journals cannot be predatory in the fee-collecting sense. This clarity helps authors identify legitimate venues.
Diamond Challenges #
Funding Vulnerability: Reliance on institutional support or grants creates risk. Budget cuts, grant endings, or changed institutional priorities can threaten journal survival.
Scale Limitations: Diamond models often struggle to scale. Growing journals need more resources, but funding may not grow proportionally. This can create backlogs or quality problems.
Volunteer Burnout: Many diamond journals depend heavily on volunteer editorial labour. Burnout among unpaid editors threatens sustainability.
Infrastructure Investment: With limited budgets, diamond journals may underinvest in technology, professional services, or improvements that enhance quality and discoverability.
The Indian Context #
Indian scholarly publishing includes both models. Many university-supported journals operate on diamond principles, funded by institutional allocations. Some have introduced APCs as institutions reduce support or as journals seek sustainability beyond institutional dependence.
For Indian researchers as authors, APCs present real barriers. Research funding often doesn't include publication fee budgets. Converting rupees to dollars for international journal fees strains resources. This creates pressure toward diamond journals—but those journals face their own sustainability challenges.
UGC-CARE listing requirements have pressured journals regardless of funding model to improve quality and transparency. Meeting these standards requires investment that both APC and diamond journals must somehow fund.
Waiver Policies and Hybrid Approaches #
Many APC journals offer waivers or discounts for authors demonstrating financial need. This attempts to address equity concerns while maintaining APC-based sustainability. Waiver policies vary from generous to nearly nonexistent.
Some journals combine approaches: institutional support covers base operations while modest APCs supplement funding. Others offer authors choice between paying APCs or accepting delayed publication in a subscription version.
Choosing for Your Journal #
Model selection depends on your circumstances:
Stable Institutional Support: If your institution provides reliable, ongoing funding, diamond publishing may be sustainable and align with institutional mission.
Society or Community Journal: Journals serving defined communities may find diamond support through society dues, community contributions, or shared resources.
Independence Priority: If freedom from institutional dependence matters, APCs provide self-sustaining revenue—though at cost of author accessibility.
Author Community: Consider your likely authors. Fields with well-funded research (medicine, some sciences) may support APCs easily. Fields with limited funding (humanities, some social sciences) may find APCs prohibitive.
Competitive Position: Examine peer journals. If competitors charge no APCs, introducing fees may disadvantage submissions. If APCs are normal in your field, authors expect them.
Sustainability Planning #
Whichever model you choose, sustainability requires planning:
For APC Journals: Develop waiver policies addressing equity concerns. Consider pricing relative to author communities' resources. Build submission volume sufficient for financial viability. Maintain quality despite acceptance-revenue linkage.
For Diamond Journals: Secure multi-year commitments where possible. Diversify funding sources to reduce single-point-of-failure risk. Invest in efficiency to stretch limited resources. Plan editorial succession to prevent burnout-driven collapse.
For Both: Professional infrastructure reduces ongoing costs. Proper OJS configuration, reliable hosting, and efficient workflows make operations sustainable regardless of funding model.
Communicating Your Model #
Transparency about funding builds trust. Your journal website should clearly explain:
Whether APCs exist and exact amounts. Waiver availability and application process. How diamond operations are funded (if relevant). What fees cover in terms of services provided.
This transparency helps authors make informed decisions and demonstrates legitimate operations distinct from predatory practices.
